SitePath › County map › Minnesota

Minnesota solar permitting

More than half at low to moderate risk A handful at high risk No active solar moratorium
State policy: RPS 100% by 2040

Grade distribution

ABCD

Overview

Every Minnesota county is scored on the SitePath solar permitting index. More than half are graded A or B, meaning they present low to moderate permitting risk for utility-scale solar projects. A sizeable minority sit in the C range — moderate risk with meaningful process uncertainty. A handful are rated D or F — high to very high risk, often due to active moratoria, restrictive setback ordinances, or strong local opposition.

The most favorable jurisdictions in Minnesota include Ramsey County (grade A), Hennepin County (grade A), Rock County (grade A). The most challenging include Nicollet County (grade D), Le Sueur County (grade D), Carver County (grade D).

At the state level, Minnesota's RPS 100% by 2040 commitment creates a supportive macro environment for solar development, though county-level boards retain significant discretion over individual project approvals. No Minnesota counties currently have an active utility-scale solar moratorium.

All counties — sorted by risk score (best first)

County Grade Score Trajectory Moratorium
Ramsey CountyA26—
Hennepin CountyA27—
Rock CountyA28—
Saint Louis CountyA29—
Todd CountyB30—
Crow Wing CountyB30—
Anoka CountyB31—
Houston CountyB33—
Big Stone CountyB34—
Traverse CountyB35—
Polk CountyB35—
Lake CountyB35—
Jackson CountyB35—
Steele CountyB35—
McLeod CountyB35—
Brown CountyB36—
Waseca CountyB36—
Marshall CountyB36—
Roseau CountyB36—
Lac qui Parle CountyB36—
Rice CountyB36—
Cottonwood CountyB36—
Stevens CountyB36—
Kittson CountyB36—
Pennington CountyB36—
Beltrami CountyB36—
Watonwan CountyB36—
Otter Tail CountyB36—
Norman CountyB36—
Lincoln CountyB36—
Dakota CountyB36—
Scott CountyB36—
Hubbard CountyB36—
Aitkin CountyB36—
Stearns CountyB36—
Becker CountyB36—
Itasca CountyB36—
Mille Lacs CountyB36—
Kanabec CountyB36—
Cass CountyB36—
Lake of the Woods CountyB36—
Koochiching CountyB36—
Clearwater CountyB37—
Mahnomen CountyB37—
Washington CountyB37—
Renville CountyB37—
Dodge CountyB38—
Mower CountyB39—
Martin CountyB40—
Swift CountyB40—
Wilkin CountyB40—
Isanti CountyB40—
Cook CountyB40—
Morrison CountyB40—
Grant CountyB40—
Pine CountyB40—
Chippewa CountyB40—
Wright CountyB41—
Douglas CountyB41—
Fillmore CountyB41—
Red Lake CountyB41—
Carlton CountyB41—
Clay CountyC42—
Olmsted CountyC42—
Freeborn CountyC43—
Murray CountyC43—
Sibley CountyC43—
Yellow Medicine CountyC43—
Redwood CountyC43—
Kandiyohi CountyC43—
Blue Earth CountyC43—
Winona CountyC43—
Pope CountyC44—
Pipestone CountyC44—
Sherburne CountyC45—
Wabasha CountyC45—
Goodhue CountyC45—
Wadena CountyC45—
Benton CountyC46—
Faribault CountyC47—
Lyon CountyC47—
Chisago CountyC49—
Meeker CountyC49—
Nobles CountyC49—
Nicollet CountyD55—
Le Sueur CountyD55—
Carver CountyD56—

See the full interactive map

County grades, scores, and ordinance data are also available on the interactive county map with filtering by grade, state, and risk factor.

Open the county map →

About SitePath scoring

Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →

SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.