Meeker County
Meeker County, Minnesota: solar permitting grade C (score 46/100, Elevated Risk). Score has been stable over the last 12 months. Primary-source ordinance and board-vote data on SitePath.
Public summary
| Grade | C · Elevated Risk · Score 46/100 |
| Population | 23,595 |
| Solar ordinance | Active solar ordinance on the books |
| Active moratorium | None on record |
| Regulatory trajectory | Stable (no material ordinance movement) |
| 12-month score movement | Stable |
| Last verified | 2026-05-02 |
Developer outlook
Meeker County carries elevated permitting risk. Developers should budget additional time for ordinance review, public hearing preparation, and community engagement. Minnesota's state RPS policy provides a supportive macro backdrop for renewables, even where individual county ordinances are restrictive.
Local intel
On file: energy-related meetings · named opposition groups
- 2026-07-22SolarThe Meeker County Planning Commission approved a special-use permit for a solar farm with a capacity of up to 300 kilowatts. · agenda
- 2026-03-17TransmissionThe Board was updated on the transmission line work being done by Great River Energy. · agenda
- 2026-02-10Data CenterData center usage and power rates were discussed in relation to conditional use and zoning. · agenda
Cities, towns & townships
Local governments in Meeker County. An incorporated city, town or village can adopt its own zoning, separate from the county’s.
- Cedar Mills city
- Cosmos city
- Darwin city
- Dassel city
- Eden Valley city
- Grove City city
- Kingston city
- Litchfield city
- Watkins city
- Acton township
- Cedar Mills township
- Collinwood township
- Cosmos township
- Danielson township
- Darwin township
- Dassel township
- Ellsworth township
- Forest City township
- Forest Prairie township
- Greenleaf township
- Harvey township
- Kingston township
- Litchfield township
- Manannah township
Show all
- Swede Grove township
- Union Grove township
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, incorporated places and county subdivisions with an active government.
Nearby counties
- Kandiyohi County · ≈23 miC43—
- McLeod County · ≈24 miB35—
- Wright County · ≈28 miB39—
- Stearns County · ≈30 miB36—
- Renville County · ≈35 miB37—
- Sibley County · ≈41 miC43—
Compare these counties side-by-side →
Meeker County ranks #82 of 87 ranked Minnesota counties (1 = lowest permitting risk). Lowest-risk in Minnesota: Ramsey County (A · 26), Hennepin County (A · 27), Saint Louis County (A · 28). See all Minnesota county grades →
Want the full record?
Setback distances, board vote histories, source documents, and ordinance amendments are available in the full county profile. The map is free; a walkthrough shows you the underlying record.
About this score
Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →
Related reading
SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.