Chisago County
Chisago County, Minnesota: solar permitting grade C (score 49/100, Elevated Risk). Score has been stable over the last 12 months. Primary-source ordinance and board-vote data on SitePath.
Public summary
| Grade | C · Elevated Risk · Score 49/100 |
| Population | 55,832 |
| Solar ordinance | Active solar ordinance on the books |
| Active moratorium | None on record |
| Regulatory trajectory | Stable (no material ordinance movement) |
| 12-month score movement | Stable |
| Last verified | 2026-05-02 |
Developer outlook
Chisago County carries elevated permitting risk. Developers should budget additional time for ordinance review, public hearing preparation, and community engagement. Minnesota's state RPS policy provides a supportive macro backdrop for renewables, even where individual county ordinances are restrictive. Market saturation is elevated in this area — expect competition for prime land parcels and interconnection capacity.
Local intel
On file: energy-related meetings
- 2026-08-27SolarPractical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. · agenda
- 2026-08-05Data CenterThe Board of Commissioners directed county staff to prepare an Interim Zoning Ordinance imposing a 12-month moratorium on data center development. · agenda
- 2026-07-30SolarThe Planning Commission approved a special-use permit application for a 150 MW solar farm in Chisago County. · agenda
Cities, towns & townships
Local governments in Chisago County. An incorporated city, town or village can adopt its own zoning, separate from the county’s.
- Center City city
- Chisago City city
- Harris city
- Lindstrom city
- North Branch city
- Rush City city
- Shafer city
- Stacy city
- Taylors Falls city
- Wyoming city
- Amador township
- Chisago Lake township
- Fish Lake township
- Franconia township
- Lent township
- Nessel township
- Rushseba township
- Shafer township
- Sunrise township
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, incorporated places and county subdivisions with an active government.
Nearby counties
- Isanti County · ≈19 miB40—
- Polk County, WI · ≈22 miB35—
- Anoka County · ≈23 miB31—
- Washington County · ≈32 miB37—
- Ramsey County · ≈35 miA26—
- Burnett County, WI · ≈36 miB39—
Compare these counties side-by-side →
Chisago County ranks #82 of 87 ranked Minnesota counties (1 = lowest permitting risk). Lowest-risk in Minnesota: Ramsey County (A · 26), Hennepin County (A · 27), Rock County (A · 28). See all Minnesota county grades →
Want the full record?
Setback distances, board vote histories, source documents, and ordinance amendments are available in the full county profile. The map is free; a walkthrough shows you the underlying record.
About this score
Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →
Related reading
SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.