Provo, East Vincent, Naperville, San Marcos, Rochelle. Every recent data-center refusal we can point to was handed down by a city council or a township — inside counties that look unremarkable from a county-level screen.
SitePath Intelligence editorial desk
The counties that have shut the door on data centers
39 counties across 12 states hold a moratorium, a ban, or rules tightened specifically against data-center development. Shading is the count per state; each dot is one county.
Counties restrictingnone1234–78+One restricting county
County-level records only. A township or city moratorium inside an otherwise permissive county does not shade the state — Michigan alone has dozens — so read this as a floor, not a census.
County ordinance and resolution records, read 27 August 2026. Territories are outside the projection.
In three days in August, boards in Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and Wisconsin adopted or extended data-center moratoria covering 674,579 residents.
In eighteen months the instrument went from a township's 180-day pause to a governor freezing an interconnection queue and a bill in both chambers of Congress. Each rung up the ladder is harder to route around than the one below it.
Nine Massachusetts towns voted to block solar or battery storage. The Attorney General struck down the bylaws, one at a time, under a statute most developers have never read.
Governor Abbott froze roughly 250–300 grid-connection requests representing about 200 GW — more than twice ERCOT's record peak. For the first time the binding constraint on a data center isn't a county board. It's the queue.
Ask where data centers get blocked in America and most people still say Northern Virginia. Georgia, Michigan and the Carolinas now hold the overwhelming majority of restricted counties. Virginia holds one.
Of 507 counties SitePath tracks for battery storage, five are in a restrictive posture. Meanwhile 114 have written a standalone BESS ordinance and 223 reference NFPA 855.
When a Virginia county wanted to keep utility-scale solar out, the state legislature took the decision away from it.
SitePath Intelligence editorial desk
What the objections are about
Public objections on record, by the technology they name
Assigned from the source document; an objection naming two technologies is counted under the one it leads with.
View as table
Category
Value
Data centers
1,410 on record
Utility-scale solar
781 on record
Wind
517 on record
Battery storage
323 on record
General energy
159 on record
Transmission
64 on record
Data centers draw the restrictions solar used to
Counties with a moratorium, ban or specifically tightened rules on the books
County ordinances and board resolutions. Municipal and township action sits below this line and is not counted here.
View as table
Category
Value
Data centers
39 counties
Utility-scale solar
12 counties
Battery storage
5 counties
Where the pipeline stands
Most of the map is already built
Data-center facilities by where they stand today
Eleven denials in ten thousand records is not a measure of how often projects get stopped. Most are stopped earlier — by a moratorium that means no application is ever filed, or by a developer who walks away before a vote and leaves no document behind.
Latest publicly stated status for each facility, read 27 August 2026. A project can sit in "announced" for years without either a refusal or a shovel.
What The Scoop is. A weekly read on where energy and data-center
projects are getting waved through, slowed down, or stopped cold — written from
the ordinances, board votes, dockets and filings themselves. Every figure traces to a
primary document. If a value cannot be verified against one, it does not run.
Think we got something wrong? Say so —
hello@sitepathintel.com. We print
corrections; we do not quietly edit. Tips about a hearing, a vote or a filing are
always welcome, and we will not name you unless you ask us to.