Solar permitting — Richland County, South Carolina
2 known opposition groups.
⛔ ACTIVE MORATORIUM — Active Moratorium; moratorium expires —confirm expiration with county planning. Permitting: CUP via Richland County Planning Commission; 250-ft max / 100-ft min setbacks. Track record: denial on record — Northeast Richland Solar (35 MW, 2022, denied — Fort Jackson compatibility…
Key driver: Richland earns C grade reflecting the structural land constraint of being SC's capital metro county; Fort Jackson military presence restricts significant portions, urban growth limits agricultural land, and high compliance (55) reflects CUP process with Fort Jackson compatibility review; the Eastover/Hopkins rural corridor remains viable, demonstrated by three approved projects, but options are structurally narrow
Permitting process
Local permitting pathway
CUP via Richland County Planning Commission; County Council final approval; Fort Jackson compatibility review for parcels within 5 miles of installation boundary; decommissioning bond standard
Setbacks & buffers
250 ft from residential structures; 150 ft from road ROW; 100 ft from property lines; Fort Jackson noise/flight buffer setbacks apply in eastern county; decommissioning bond required
Spacing requirements
Not specified
Size restrictions
Large-scale (>20 MW) effectively limited to Eastover/Hopkins rural zones in SE county
Penalties & bonding
Total penalty: +5 (Denial +5)
State-level permits & approvals
County zoning authority; no state solar preemption; special exception or conditional use permit typically required for utility-scale (>1 MW); decommissioning bond increasingly required
Full records for this county are part of a SitePath subscription.
State policy & grid context
State RPS & clean energy policy
No binding RPS | None | Energy Freedom Act (2019) addresses solar but no state RPS
State incentive programs
Federal ITC eligible; SC state income tax credit for solar (25% up to $35,000 for commercial); SC Energy Freedom Act net metering provisions
Grid & interconnection
SERC-SE; Duke Energy Progress
Full records for this county are part of a SitePath subscription.
Battery storage (BESS) P1 State-Default Permitting
No confirmed county BESS ordinance.
Local BESS ordinances & bylaws
Tracked storage projects
County-level battery-storage status, safety requirements, and projects — each linked to a primary source.
Community opposition P1 2 tracked
Organized opposition signals on record for this county — petitions, community groups, and oppositional coverage — each linked to its primary source.
- Rep. Nancy Mace on X: "South Carolina is not Big Tech's personal power grid. We're calling for a one-year moratorium on Data center
- r/southcarolina on Reddit: Massive data center plan dropped in SC after latest public outcry against projects Data center
SitePath maintains the most complete community-opposition dataset available, refreshed continuously from primary sources.
Subscriber intel Subscribers
Researched for this county and available with a subscription:
- 🔒Project track record
- 🔒Developer intelligence
- 🔒Community & board sentiment
- 🔒Governing board
Energy-related meetings & dockets P1
No tracked activity yet — coverage expands weekly.
State PSC dockets P1
No tracked activity yet — coverage expands weekly.
Sentiment rollup P2
No sentiment rollup yet (requires meeting transcripts to be processed).
Local news P3
No tracked activity yet — coverage expands weekly.
Filter by grade, state, moratorium status, and compliance stringency. Compare counties side by side.