South Carolina solar permitting
Grade distribution
Overview
Every South Carolina county is scored on the SitePath solar permitting index. A sizeable minority are graded A or B, meaning they present low to moderate permitting risk for utility-scale solar projects. About half sit in the C range — moderate risk with meaningful process uncertainty. A minority are rated D or F — high to very high risk, often due to active moratoria, restrictive setback ordinances, or strong local opposition.
The most favorable jurisdictions in South Carolina include Marion County (grade B), Union County (grade B), Clarendon County (grade B). The most challenging include Spartanburg County (grade D), Beaufort County (grade D), Lexington County (grade D).
The state's policy environment — No binding RPS — presents headwinds for renewable development, making county-level permitting conditions especially important to evaluate project by project. No South Carolina counties currently have an active utility-scale solar moratorium.
All counties — sorted by risk score (best first)
| County | Grade | Score | Trajectory | Moratorium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion County | B | 32 | — | |
| Union County | B | 34 | — | |
| Clarendon County | B | 34 | — | |
| Cherokee County | B | 35 | — | |
| Marlboro County | B | 37 | — | |
| Bamberg County | B | 38 | — | |
| Williamsburg County | B | 38 | — | |
| Newberry County | B | 39 | — | |
| Abbeville County | B | 39 | — | |
| Aiken County | B | 39 | — | |
| Fairfield County | B | 39 | — | |
| Chesterfield County | B | 41 | — | |
| Kershaw County | B | 41 | — | |
| Greenville County | B | 41 | — | |
| McCormick County | B | 41 | — | |
| Lee County | B | 41 | — | |
| Chester County | C | 42 | — | |
| Laurens County | C | 42 | — | |
| Dorchester County | C | 42 | — | |
| Charleston County | C | 42 | — | |
| Edgefield County | C | 42 | — | |
| Berkeley County | C | 43 | — | |
| Dillon County | C | 44 | — | |
| Richland County | C | 44 | — | |
| Saluda County | C | 44 | — | |
| Oconee County | C | 45 | — | |
| Georgetown County | C | 46 | — | |
| Jasper County | C | 47 | — | |
| Barnwell County | C | 47 | — | |
| Greenwood County | C | 47 | — | |
| Hampton County | C | 47 | — | |
| Anderson County | C | 48 | — | |
| Allendale County | C | 48 | — | |
| Florence County | C | 48 | — | |
| Darlington County | C | 49 | — | |
| Calhoun County | C | 49 | — | |
| Sumter County | C | 52 | — | |
| Orangeburg County | D | 52 | — | |
| Lancaster County | D | 54 | — | |
| Colleton County | D | 54 | — | |
| York County | D | 54 | — | |
| Pickens County | D | 55 | — | |
| Horry County | D | 59 | — | |
| Spartanburg County | D | 61 | — | |
| Beaufort County | D | 62 | — | |
| Lexington County | D | 64 | — |
See the full interactive map
County grades, scores, and ordinance data are also available on the interactive county map with filtering by grade, state, and risk factor.
Open the county map →About SitePath scoring
Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →
SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.