SitePath › County map › North Carolina

North Carolina solar permitting

A sizeable minority at low to moderate risk A minority at high risk Active solar moratoria on the books
State policy: RPS 12% by 2021

Grade distribution

ABCDF

Overview

Every North Carolina county is scored on the SitePath solar permitting index. A sizeable minority are graded A or B, meaning they present low to moderate permitting risk for utility-scale solar projects. A sizeable minority sit in the C range — moderate risk with meaningful process uncertainty. A minority are rated D or F — high to very high risk, often due to active moratoria, restrictive setback ordinances, or strong local opposition.

The most favorable jurisdictions in North Carolina include Iredell County (grade A), Tyrrell County (grade B), Cherokee County (grade B). The most challenging include Edgecombe County (grade F), Davidson County (grade F), Greene County (grade F).

North Carolina's RPS framework (RPS 12% by 2021) has a mixed effect on local solar permitting: state incentives can accelerate projects, but county boards often act independently of state policy direction. Davidson County, Greene County currently have active utility-scale solar moratoria. These represent hard barriers where project approvals are unlikely until the moratorium is lifted by county vote.

All counties — sorted by risk score (best first)

County Grade Score Trajectory Moratorium
Iredell CountyA28—
Tyrrell CountyB31—
Cherokee CountyB31—
Union CountyB33—
Brunswick CountyB34—
New Hanover CountyB35—
Pamlico CountyB35—
Carteret CountyB35—
Dare CountyB37—
Polk CountyB37—
Lincoln CountyB37—
Transylvania CountyB37—
Alleghany CountyB37—
Ashe CountyB37—
Jackson CountyB37—
Macon CountyB37—
Onslow CountyB38—
Avery CountyB38—
Yancey CountyB38—
Mitchell CountyB38—
Clay CountyB38—
Pender CountyB38—
Rockingham CountyB38—
Granville CountyB38—
Wilkes CountyB38—
Buncombe CountyB39—
Madison CountyB39—
Pasquotank CountyB39—
Caldwell CountyB39—
Robeson CountyB39—
Henderson CountyB39—
McDowell CountyB40—
Stanly CountyB40—
Beaufort CountyB40—
Warren CountyB40—
Guilford CountyB40—
Watauga CountyB40—
Wilson CountyB41—
Hyde CountyB41—
Person CountyB41—
Bladen CountyB41—
Gates CountyC42—
Hertford CountyC43—
Moore CountyC43—
Harnett CountyC43—
Halifax CountyC43—
Alexander CountyC43—
Burke CountyC43—
Chowan CountyC44—
Surry CountyC44—
Cabarrus CountyC44—
Davie CountyC45—
Haywood CountyC46—
Caswell CountyC46—
Gaston CountyC47—
Craven CountyC47—
Mecklenburg CountyC47—
Sampson CountyC47—
Randolph CountyC48—
Anson CountyC48—
Johnston CountyC48—
Columbus CountyC48—
Hoke CountyC48—
Alamance CountyC48—
Camden CountyC49—
Graham CountyC49—
Bertie CountyC49—
Franklin CountyC49—
Yadkin CountyC49—
Forsyth CountyC49—
Montgomery CountyC49—
Duplin CountyC50—
Cumberland CountyC50—
Rutherford CountyC50—
Jones CountyC50—
Lenoir CountyC50—
Wayne CountyC50—
Perquimans CountyC50—
Martin CountyC51—
Catawba CountyC51—
Pitt CountyC52—
Nash CountyD52—
Northampton CountyD53—
Currituck CountyD54—
Richmond CountyD54—
Scotland CountyD54—
Swain CountyD54—
Washington CountyD54—
Durham CountyD57—
Orange CountyD57—
Wake CountyD58—
Stokes CountyD62—
Lee CountyD62—
Chatham CountyD63—
Rowan CountyD63—
Cleveland CountyD64—
Vance CountyF66—
Edgecombe CountyF68—
Davidson CountyF100—Active
Greene CountyF100—Active

See the full interactive map

County grades, scores, and ordinance data are also available on the interactive county map with filtering by grade, state, and risk factor.

Open the county map →

About SitePath scoring

Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →

SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.