SitePath › County map › Nebraska

Nebraska solar permitting

More than half at low to moderate risk A handful at high risk Active solar moratoria on the books
State policy: No binding RPS

Grade distribution

BCDF

Overview

Every Nebraska county is scored on the SitePath solar permitting index. More than half are graded A or B, meaning they present low to moderate permitting risk for utility-scale solar projects. A minority sit in the C range — moderate risk with meaningful process uncertainty. A handful are rated D or F — high to very high risk, often due to active moratoria, restrictive setback ordinances, or strong local opposition.

The most favorable jurisdictions in Nebraska include Hamilton County (grade B), Jefferson County (grade B), Pawnee County (grade B). The most challenging include Sherman County (grade D), Frontier County (grade F), Knox County (grade F).

The state's policy environment — No binding RPS — presents headwinds for renewable development, making county-level permitting conditions especially important to evaluate project by project. Knox County currently has an active utility-scale solar moratorium — a hard barrier for project development that typically requires a board vote to lift.

All counties — sorted by risk score (best first)

County Grade Score Trajectory Moratorium
Hamilton CountyB33—
Jefferson CountyB33—
Pawnee CountyB34—
Logan CountyB34—
Cheyenne CountyB34—
Wayne CountyB35—
Antelope CountyB35—
Cuming CountyB35—
Boone CountyB35—
Kimball CountyB35—
Saline CountyB36—
Franklin CountyB36—
Box Butte CountyB36—
Keya Paha CountyB36—
Polk CountyB37—
Seward CountyB37—
Howard CountyB37—
Kearney CountyB38—
Clay CountyB38—
York CountyB38—
McPherson CountyB38—
Thayer CountyB38—
Saunders CountyB40—
Fillmore CountyB40—
Colfax CountyB40—
Dawson CountyB40—
Nemaha CountyB40—
Platte CountyB40—
Richardson CountyB40—
Thurston CountyB40—
Merrick CountyB40—
Dawes CountyB40—
Dixon CountyB40—
Johnson CountyB40—
Keith CountyB40—
Stanton CountyB40—
Cedar CountyB40—
Holt CountyB41—
Morrill CountyB41—
Nance CountyB41—
Nuckolls CountyB41—
Sheridan CountyB41—
Valley CountyB41—
Custer CountyB41—
Chase CountyB41—
Perkins CountyB41—
Webster CountyB41—
Furnas CountyB41—
Brown CountyB41—
Greeley CountyB41—
Gosper CountyB41—
Hitchcock CountyB41—
Garfield CountyB41—
Boyd CountyB41—
Cherry CountyB41—
Deuel CountyB41—
Dundy CountyB41—
Grant CountyB41—
Hayes CountyB41—
Hooker CountyB41—
Loup CountyB41—
Rock CountyB41—
Sioux CountyB41—
Thomas CountyB41—
Wheeler CountyB41—
Blaine CountyB41—
Garden CountyB41—
Arthur CountyB41—
Banner CountyB41—
Adams CountyC42—
Cass CountyC42—
Buffalo CountyC42—
Dakota CountyC43—
Hall CountyC43—
Douglas CountyC43—
Dodge CountyC43—
Red Willow CountyC44—
Otoe CountyC46—
Pierce CountyC46—
Scotts Bluff CountyC48—
Washington CountyC48—
Butler CountyC48—
Harlan CountyC49—
Sarpy CountyC49—
Madison CountyD52—
Lancaster CountyD52—
Gage CountyD53—
Lincoln CountyD58—
Burt CountyD62—
Phelps CountyD64—
Sherman CountyD65—
Frontier CountyF66—
Knox CountyF100—Active

See the full interactive map

County grades, scores, and ordinance data are also available on the interactive county map with filtering by grade, state, and risk factor.

Open the county map →

About SitePath scoring

Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →

SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.