SitePath › County map › Iowa

Iowa solar permitting

More than half at low to moderate risk A minority at high risk Active solar moratoria on the books
State policy: RPS on file · no % target

Grade distribution

ABCDF

Overview

Every Iowa county is scored on the SitePath solar permitting index. More than half are graded A or B, meaning they present low to moderate permitting risk for utility-scale solar projects. A sizeable minority sit in the C range — moderate risk with meaningful process uncertainty. A minority are rated D or F — high to very high risk, often due to active moratoria, restrictive setback ordinances, or strong local opposition.

The most favorable jurisdictions in Iowa include Polk County (grade A), Scott County (grade A), Wapello County (grade B). The most challenging include Linn County (grade D), Cerro Gordo County (grade F), Clarke County (grade F).

Iowa's RPS framework (RPS on file · no % target) has a mixed effect on local solar permitting: state incentives can accelerate projects, but county boards often act independently of state policy direction. Cerro Gordo County, Clarke County currently have active utility-scale solar moratoria. These represent hard barriers where project approvals are unlikely until the moratorium is lifted by county vote.

All counties — sorted by risk score (best first)

County Grade Score Trajectory Moratorium
Polk CountyA25—
Scott CountyA29—
Wapello CountyB30—
Lyon CountyB30—
Carroll CountyB31—
Crawford CountyB31—
Story CountyB33—
Washington CountyB33—
Winnebago CountyB34—
Warren CountyB34—
Jackson CountyB35—
Van Buren CountyB35—
Buchanan CountyB35—
Benton CountyB35—
Butler CountyB35—
Humboldt CountyB35—
Pocahontas CountyB36—
Clayton CountyB36—
Lucas CountyB36—
Marion CountyB36—
Plymouth CountyB37—
Howard CountyB37—
Jasper CountyB37—
Cedar CountyB37—
Marshall CountyB37—
Bremer CountyB37—
Delaware CountyB37—
Jones CountyB37—
Hamilton CountyB37—
Chickasaw CountyB37—
Jefferson CountyB37—
Mahaska CountyB37—
Franklin CountyB37—
Allamakee CountyB37—
O'Brien CountyB37—
Fayette CountyB37—
Guthrie CountyB37—
Harrison CountyB37—
Clay CountyB37—
Keokuk CountyB37—
Hancock CountyB37—
Wright CountyB37—
Palo Alto CountyB37—
Dallas CountyB38—
Black Hawk CountyB38—
Winneshiek CountyB38—
Poweshiek CountyB38—
Lee CountyB39—
Taylor CountyB39—
Boone CountyB39—
Grundy CountyB39—
Pottawattamie CountyB39—
Audubon CountyB39—
Osceola CountyB39—
Shelby CountyB39—
Sac CountyB39—
Webster CountyB40—
Adair CountyB40—
Buena Vista CountyB40—
Mitchell CountyB40—
Greene CountyB41—
Worth CountyC42—
Muscatine CountyC42—
Ringgold CountyC43—
Des Moines CountyC43—
Union CountyC43—
Hardin CountyC43—
Montgomery CountyC43—
Ida CountyC43—
Appanoose CountyC43—
Monona CountyC43—
Calhoun CountyC43—
Cass CountyC43—
Fremont CountyC43—
Page CountyC43—
Wayne CountyC44—
Monroe CountyC44—
Louisa CountyC45—
Davis CountyC45—
Mills CountyC45—
Clinton CountyC46—
Tama CountyC48—
Cherokee CountyC48—
Emmet CountyC48—
Decatur CountyC49—
Kossuth CountyC50—Not verified
Sioux CountyD52—
Adams CountyD53—
Johnson CountyD53—
Iowa CountyD55—
Madison CountyD55—
Henry CountyD55—
Floyd CountyD56—
Dickinson CountyD56—
Woodbury CountyD58—
Dubuque CountyD58—
Linn CountyD64—
Cerro Gordo CountyF100—Active
Clarke CountyF100—Active

See the full interactive map

County grades, scores, and ordinance data are also available on the interactive county map with filtering by grade, state, and risk factor.

Open the county map →

About SitePath scoring

Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →

SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.