Idaho solar permitting
Grade distribution
Overview
Every Idaho county is scored on the SitePath solar permitting index. About half are graded A or B, meaning they present low to moderate permitting risk for utility-scale solar projects. A sizeable minority sit in the C range — moderate risk with meaningful process uncertainty. A minority are rated D or F — high to very high risk, often due to active moratoria, restrictive setback ordinances, or strong local opposition.
The most favorable jurisdictions in Idaho include Blaine County (grade A), Teton County (grade A), Latah County (grade A). The most challenging include Ada County (grade D), Idaho County (grade D), Bannock County (grade F).
The state's policy environment — No binding RPS — presents headwinds for renewable development, making county-level permitting conditions especially important to evaluate project by project. Bannock County currently has an active utility-scale solar moratorium — a hard barrier for project development that typically requires a board vote to lift.
All counties — sorted by risk score (best first)
| County | Grade | Score | Trajectory | Moratorium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaine County | A | 18 | — | |
| Teton County | A | 19 | — | |
| Latah County | A | 25 | — | |
| Washington County | B | 33 | — | |
| Bonneville County | B | 36 | — | |
| Lincoln County | B | 37 | — | |
| Butte County | B | 38 | — | |
| Gooding County | B | 39 | — | |
| Jefferson County | B | 39 | — | |
| Nez Perce County | B | 39 | — | |
| Bingham County | B | 39 | — | |
| Franklin County | B | 39 | — | |
| Madison County | B | 39 | — | |
| Payette County | B | 39 | — | |
| Bear Lake County | B | 40 | — | |
| Boise County | B | 40 | — | |
| Caribou County | B | 40 | — | |
| Oneida County | B | 40 | — | |
| Lemhi County | B | 41 | — | |
| Camas County | B | 41 | — | |
| Custer County | B | 41 | — | |
| Twin Falls County | B | 41 | — | |
| Clark County | B | 41 | — | |
| Power County | B | 41 | — | |
| Minidoka County | C | 42 | — | |
| Jerome County | C | 43 | — | |
| Lewis County | C | 43 | — | |
| Elmore County | C | 43 | — | |
| Cassia County | C | 43 | — | |
| Gem County | C | 45 | — | |
| Bonner County | C | 46 | — | |
| Benewah County | C | 46 | — | |
| Clearwater County | C | 46 | — | |
| Adams County | C | 49 | — | |
| Owyhee County | C | 51 | — | |
| Fremont County | C | 51 | — | |
| Shoshone County | C | 51 | — | |
| Valley County | D | 52 | — | |
| Boundary County | D | 53 | — | |
| Canyon County | D | 56 | — | |
| Kootenai County | D | 56 | — | |
| Ada County | D | 58 | — | |
| Idaho County | D | 61 | — | |
| Bannock County | F | 100 | — | Active |
See the full interactive map
County grades, scores, and ordinance data are also available on the interactive county map with filtering by grade, state, and risk factor.
Open the county map →About SitePath scoring
Every U.S. county is scored 0–100 on solar permitting risk (lower is friendlier to development). The grade is a weighted composite of compliance stringency, market saturation, regulatory trajectory, and data uncertainty. Every figure traces back to a primary government document. Read the full methodology →
SitePath Intelligence is a research platform. Data verified as of 2026-05-02. Scores update on a quarterly review cycle.